MMR Vaccine Perspective
Monday, March 1st, 2010 by Amy Porter
Our readers know how I feel about vaccines. These are not the vaccines that Benjamin Franklin advocated more than two hundred years ago. These are not the vaccines that were created in the 50s and 60s. These are chemical cocktails that challenge our children’s health and immune system. They also challenge the health of adults as well.
The choice is yours, as parents whether to inoculate your children and at what age. My only request is that you look at all of the data. And, not blindly agree to vaccines because your pediatrician says it’s okay. That’s what my pediatrician said when asked about trace amounts of mercury and aluminum in the booster shots. If it was okay, then why six month later did his practice switch to vaccines with fewer trace chemicals?
The only way your pediatrican will change is if you first educate yourself and then educate them by refusing to spending your money on poor quality drugs – not just vaccines.
If you are looking for information, I highly recommend the column below written by Kurt Perkins DC on February 3, 2010. We are reprinting it in its entirety with Dr Perkins permission. This is the first non-fear based article on MMR vaccines. This is his response to an article/attack in the British Medical Journal in January on Dr Andrew Wakefield.
MMR Perspective
By Kurt Perkins
http://drkurtrant.blogspot.com/2010/02/mmr-perspective.html
www.mychirorocks.com
All over the news there have been stories how Lancet, the British medical journal, has discredited and voided out the research done by Dr. Andrew Wakefield. In the Lancet article, Wakefield made a mere SUGGESTION that there MAY be a connection between autism and the MMR vaccine, BUT further studies had to be performed, this was back in the late ‘90s. That was it, and this was career suicide for him ever since. To do further studies, he had to do his OWN research. This is where the supposed ‘conflict of interest’ has come in the news. A group paid him to do research. In case you don’t know, it costs money to do research, so he got paid to work. Read on as we discuss the conflict of interest perspective from the leading pro-vaccine front man.
I’ve waited a week to comment on this issue because I was waiting to see if Dr. Paul Offit was going to make an appearance and he, in fact, did this morning on CBS’s morning program (2/3/10). I waited because Dr. Offit is the vaccine industries highest paid unofficial spokes person. Dr. Profit Offit has earned close to $10 million in royalties from the Rotateq vaccine and stands to earn $13-$35 million over the life of the vaccine patents, the one he invented, as well as voted into the child’s mandatory vaccine schedule.
This is the same man that said a baby could tolerate 100,000 vaccines safely. He also took home $29 million from the sale of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) as part of a $182 million sale of its worldwide royalty interest in the Merck Rotateq vaccine to Royal Pharma. The amount could be as high as $42 million, based on an analysis of current CHOP administrative policies.
Perspective on conflict of interest is always necessary, especially from a group such as the vaccine industry that has billions and billions of dollars to bury any contrary thought or notion that challenges their cash cow dogma. Ask this question. If everyone stopped getting the MMR vaccine, would Dr. Wakefield make any money from those decisions? On the contrary, how much money would the vaccine industry lose if everyone stopped getting MMR? The CDC states there were just over 4 million births in 2009. That would be a huge loss to the vaccine industry if the MMRs were stopped. Can you image a guaranteed 4 million new customers every year that would buy your product more than once? Of course, the vaccine industry is going to nullify any accusation that vaccines cause harm.
Prior to the MMR vaccine being given at 12-15 months of age, a child could receive up to 25 doses of vaccines. You can find the vaccine schedule on the CDC’s webpage. What poisonous ingredients do those vaccines contain? How would you like a healthy dose of mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, MSG, and anti-freeze. Don’t believe me? Check out the CDC’s page
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf
I’m going to propose that even if a child did not receive the MMR vaccine, autism rates would still sky rocket just like they have the past 20-30 years. I also propose that mercury is not the only culprit. Do some research and look at the symptoms of heavy metal toxicity, such as aluminum. A lot of it sounds like autism type disorders to me. When vaccines are developed, they are not tested if they cause problems, just if they supposedly can prevent a minor illness most often seen in a culture where sanitation, hygiene, and lack of nutrition are problems. Not the case in the USA.
My final piece of perspective MMR PERSPECTIVE to challenge you is from the wellness paradigm. In wellness, dis-ease happens from 2 manners, deficiency, or toxicity. The human body is an eco-system. We are animated earth. There is nothing in the human body that is not Earth, unless man puts it in like mercury, formaldehyde, anti-freeze, or monkey kidney tissue. For humans to thrive, we must eat, move, and think in a manner that is required for proper genetic expression. Our cells desire to maintain balance and only become imbalanced when overtaken by deficiency or toxicity. This is the basis of physiology, not a controversial topic at all. In the case of vaccines, adding chemicals to the body to prevent minor illness has had a massive trade in overall health. ‘Science’ will hang onto the notion that mercury does not cause autism, yet they are asking the wrong questions.
The correct question should be, ‘by adding chemicals and viruses to the human eco-system in a way that nature would never allow, will the eco-system flourish or get sick?’ If you look around, the answer is we get sick. Just in kids, cancer, diabetes, auto-immune disorders, asthma, allergies, and AUTISM are at all time highs and getting worse. But science will look at the fact that fewer kids get chicken pox or fewer cases of diarrhea and call that success. It’s absurd and idiotic to say that’s a success when you see the trade off end result. Are vaccines the only culprit? Absolutely not, but from a human physiology/eco-system paradigm, vaccines will never move a cell towards balance which promotes growth and repair. If you want more info regarding vaccines, there are many books. I always recommend ‘The Sanctity of the Human Blood’ by Dr. Tim O’Shea. Don’t worry, I get ZERO kick backs for recommending his book. Another book, not so much a vaccine book but diving into the world of toxicity is called ‘Excitotoxins’ by Dr. Russell Blaylock. A third book that is great is called, ‘The Virus and the Vaccine’ by Bookchin and Schumacher. Again, I have no financial ties to these books, so it doesn’t matter to me if you read them or not. What matters to me is that you get informed from sources that are not tied to the vaccine industry but are well referenced.
Remember that health is a choice, a whole choice and nothing but a choice. BUT, those choices can only be made accurately if you ask the right questions.
Dr Perkin can be reached at 719.598.6955 or www.mychirorocks.com
By 